Norwegian School of Economics – January 2014
Bergen, Norway
Responsible Global Leadership Programme
32 Participants
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.68
Concepts presented were clear       4.71
Concepts presented are important       4.61
Presenter gave good examples       4.75
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.75
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.96
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.96
Presenter answered my questions       4.61
I understand the concepts presented       4.68
I can apply the concepts presented       4.25
The seminar met my expectations       4.29
The seminar was of value       4.32
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.46
          –  
Overall       4.65
Verbatim Comments:
Maybe shorter; 8 hours in a classroom is not human!
More help identifying our strengths and weaknesses
Best skill seminar I have had…excellent (multiple)
Nice to have experienced speaker; native English speaker
Not everything is tangible…some strategies flow into each other
Nice with lots of examples
More active; Use role playing…skill practice
Amazing seminar…outstanding speaker

************************************************************

London School of Economics – January 2014
London, England
Responsible Global Leadership Programme
80 participants
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.44
Concepts presented were clear       4.46
Concepts presented are important       4.33
Presenter gave good examples       4.29
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.35
Presenter spoke clearly       4.73
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.62
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.62
Presenter answered my questions       4.63
I understand the concepts presented       4.69
I can apply the concepts presented       4.19
The seminar met my expectations       4.10
The seminar was of value       4.13
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.13
          –  
Overall       4.41
Verbatim Comments:
Smaller group size – difficult to get interaction (multiple)
 Excellent programme – great examples. (multiple)
I am motivated to work onmy own leadership skills now.
For the time given it was perfect.  
More time in the future for feedback giving excercises.
More examples and more interaction (multiple)
Bothered by the side bar chatting among attendees (multiple)
Ban Laptops – hard to see over them; people hide behind them to chat
More time to use the development indicator.
More specialized and detailed knowledge
Not a good room design
Use a case study

*************************************************************

Wirtschaft University of Vienna – December 2013
Vienna, Austria
31 Attendees
One week block seminar
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.73
Concepts presented were clear       4.63
Concepts presented are important       4.77
Presenter gave good examples       4.67
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.80
Presenter spoke clearly       4.93
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.90
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.83
Presenter answered my questions       4.77
I understand the concepts presented       4.67
I can apply the concepts presented       4.40
The seminar met my expectations       4.60
The seminar was of value       4.73
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.73
Overall       4.73
Verbatim Comments:
Excellent content and teaching. 
Maybe make it shorter? (Multiple)
Very clear ideas conveyed.  Practical content.
More discussion on pre-course reading.
Make it more than 3 days. (Multiple)
More examples or case studies and project requirements.
Smaller work group sizes.
Perfect course…best one I took this semester.
More “real-life” simulations and practical tasks. (Multiple)
Might be the only course that will be of use to me in my career.
Very well presented concept.  Could be better pre-course work.
Great seminar…nothing to add!  (Multiple)
One of the most interesting and valuable courses I have had.

*********************************************************************

University of Koln – October 2013  
Koln, Germany  
   
One day skill seminar  
 
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.75
Concepts presented were clear       4.80
Concepts presented are important       4.70
Presenter gave good examples       4.60
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.45
Presenter spoke clearly       4.90
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.85
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.80
Presenter answered my questions       4.50
I understand the concepts presented       4.65
I can apply the concepts presented       4.40
The seminar met my expectations       4.30
The seminar was of value       4.30
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.50
          -
Overall       4.61
   
Verbatim Comments:
More details; more deep dives and practical examples. (multiple)
More strategic perspective
Don’t need to spend time on reviewing our expectations (multiple)
Split over two days
More interactive parts; role plays
Let participants prepare questions.
Keep it as is.
In general, really great; really enjoyed it. (multiple)

***********************************************************************

University College of Dublin – October 2013  
Dublin, Ireland  
   
One day skill seminar  
   
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 =  Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.90
Concepts presented were clear       5.00
Concepts presented are important       4.80
Presenter gave good examples       4.80
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.90
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.80
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.90
Presenter answered my questions       4.30
I understand the concepts presented       5.00
I can apply the concepts presented       4.60
The seminar met my expectations       4.60
The seminar was of value       4.80
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.80
          -
Overall       4.80
   
Verbatim Comments:
It was very interesting.
Should not have been confined to one day…spread across
   days to learn even more.
It exceeded my expectations.
I come away with more in-depth knowledge and awareness of
   myself as a leader and a person.
Thank you for a lovely programme.
It was a great seminar…keep groups small.
Include more theory.
Use a more controversial subject…for Listening Skills exercise.
More activities…learning by doing. (multiple)

 

***********************************************************************

Rotterdam   School of Management – October 2013  
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
One day skill seminar; Attendees = 23  
   
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 =   Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized   and presented       4.86
Concepts presented were clear       4.76
Concepts presented are   important       4.86
Presenter gave good examples       4.62
There was adequate opportunity   for participation       4.43
Presenter spoke clearly       4.95
Presenter showed enthusiasm       5.00
Presenter demonstrated   expertise       4.95
Presenter answered my   questions       4.76
I understand the concepts   presented       4.57
I can apply the concepts   presented       4.14
The seminar met my   expectations       4.62
The seminar was of value       4.67
I would recommend this seminar   for future use       4.81
          -
Overall       4.71
   
Verbatim Comments:
Examples relevant to early   leadership levels (Multiple)
More interactive; more   activities (Multiple)
Include inter-cultural   challenges
Suggest literature for   additional learning
Great program (Multiple). I   found it very useful.  Keep doing it

**********************************************************************

Rotterdam   School of Management – April 2013  
Rotterdam, The Netherlands  
   
One day skill seminar  
   
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 =   Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized   and presented       4.60
Concepts presented were clear       4.70
Concepts presented are   important       4.60
Presenter gave good examples       5.00
There was adequate opportunity   for participation       4.90
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.90
Presenter demonstrated   expertise       4.80
Presenter engaged attendees to   participate       4.70
Presenter answered my   questions       4.80
I understand the concepts   presented       4.80
I can apply the concepts   presented       4.30
The seminar met my   expectations       4.30
The seminar was of value       4.70
I would recommend this seminar   for future use       4.80
          -
Overall       4.73
   
Verbatim Comments:
More activities and simulations.
Some discussion about what is wrong with current leadership theories.
Activity of participants discussing ways of using the development guide.
Spend time discussing cultural differences.
Thanks for this wonderful day!
Very professional…little room for improvement.
Was clear and good.
Make this an integral part of the CEMS Professional Development Track

 

*************************************************************

Corvinus University of Economics – April 2013  
Budapest, Hungary
One day skill seminar
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 =   Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented       4.88
Concepts presented were clear       4.92
Concepts presented are important       4.77
Presenter gave good examples       4.81
There was adequate opportunity for participation       4.35
Presenter spoke clearly       4.88
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.96
Presenter demonstrated expertise       5.00
Presenter engaged attendees to participate       4.50
Presenter answered my questions       4.62
I understand the concepts presented       4.81
I can apply the concepts presented       4.19
The seminar met my expectations       4.54
The seminar was of value       4.77
I would recommend this seminar for future use       4.85
          -
Overall       4.72
   
Verbatim Comments:
More group exercises (multiple comments)
Have more exercises to try leadership challenges and get feedback
More examples of how we can use this at an entry level leadership position
I especially enjoyed the personal examples (multiple comments)
Some more B2C examples would be useful
Capture differences in group dynamics between private and public settings
Development assessment should be used with 3rd party input
Best seminar I have ever had during my Corvinus-CEMS-Harvard education.
Truly useful and valuable both theoretically and practically.
Best seminar ever – record on video for us to look back
Smaller group size
More days (multiple comments)
Make it clear at beginning that we can get the slides
More expressive slides

 

*************************************************************

Prague University of Economics – April 2013  
Prague, Czech Republic  
One day skill seminar  
(Scale of 1 to 5 in which 5 =   Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized   and presented       4.88
Concepts presented were clear       4.63
Concepts presented are   important       4.88
Presenter gave good examples       4.38
There was adequate opportunity   for participation       4.50
Presenter spoke clearly       4.75
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.88
Presenter demonstrated   expertise       4.88
Presenter engaged attendees to   participate       4.50
Presenter answered my   questions       4.63
I understand the concepts   presented       4.75
I can apply the concepts   presented       4.00
The seminar met my   expectations       4.50
The seminar was of value       4.88
I would recommend this seminar   for future use       5.00
Overall       4.67
   
Verbatim Comments:
Personality tests; role   playing games
Involve students participation   more
More challenging and   complicated examples
Explain the difference between   a leader and a manager
Very enriching
Exact applications of   different leadership styles
Provide slides up front

*************************************************************

Warsaw University of Economics – March 2013
Warsaw, Poland

One day Skill Seminar

Scale of   1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree

Program was well organized and presented       5.00
Concepts presented were clear       4.86
Concepts presented are important       4.86
Presenter gave good examples       4.86
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.71
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       5.00
Presenter demonstrated expertise       5.00
Presenter engaged attendees       4.86
Presenter answered my questions       4.43
I understand the concepts presented       5.00
I understand how to apply these concepts       4.71
The seminar met my expectations       4.57
The seminar was of value       4.86
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.86
Overall:       4.84
Verbatim Comments:
Add more interactive   activities
More examples on practical   use of the concepts
My expectations were fully met

************************************************************

Stockholm School of Economics – November 2012
Stockholm, Sweden

One day skill seminar

Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree

Attendees   = 14
Program was well organized and presented       4.83
Concepts presented were clear       4.58
Concepts presented are important       4.33
Presenter gave good examples       4.25
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.33
Presenter spoke clearly       4.92
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.75
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.92
Presenter engaged attendees       4.17
Presenter answered my questions       4.25
I understand the concepts presented       4.75
The seminar met my expectations       4.25
The seminar was of value       4.33
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.50
          -
Overall:       4.51
Verbatim Comments:
Add more real life Q&A   activities
Should be more interactive –   more live cases
Make it longer

************************************************************

University of Koln – October 2012
Koln, Germany

One day skill seminar

Scale of   1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree

Attendees   = 24
Program was well organized and presented       4.80
Concepts presented were clear       4.60
Concepts presented are important       4.50
Presenter gave good examples       4.40
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.40
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.70
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.90
Presenter engaged attendees       4.50
Presenter answered my questions       4.50
I understand the concepts presented       4.50
The seminar met my expectations       4.50
The seminar was of value       4.70
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.90
Overall:       4.64
Verbatim Comments:
More group exercises
2 days instead of 1 for more   details and topics
Focus more on skills for new   (young) leaders
Involve audience a bit more

************************************************************

University College of Dublin – October 2012
Dublin, Ireland

One day skill seminar

Scale of   1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree

Attendees   = 17
Program was well organized and presented       4.76
Concepts presented were clear       4.71
Concepts presented are important       4.94
Presenter gave good examples       4.94
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.59
Presenter spoke clearly       5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.88
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.88
Presenter engaged attendees       4.65
Presenter answered my questions       4.71
I understand the concepts presented       4.71
The seminar met my expectations       4.65
The seminar was of value       4.71
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.71
Overall:       4.77
Verbatim Comments:
More practical activities   (multiple responses)
Shorten examples
Make it longer…2-3 days   (multiple responses)
Very interesting and deserves   further investigation
Great programme.  Materials and activities were really
   informative and helpful
Present agenda beforehand via   email
Brilliant; Really   helpful.  Supply hard copies of   materials.
Content very suitable.  Use even more examples as presenter
   has huge experience (multiple responses)
Make discussion of Hierarchy   more interactive.

************************************************************

 

Wirtschaft University of Vienna – October 2012

Vienna, Austria

Full week block seminar

Scale of   1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree
Attendees   = 22
Program was well organized and presented       4.60
Concepts presented were clear       4.35
Concepts presented are important       4.80
Presenter gave good examples       4.65
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.90
Presenter spoke clearly       4.90
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.95
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.80
Presenter engaged attendees       4.75
Presenter answered my questions       4.60
I understand the concepts presented       4.55
The seminar met my expectations       4.40
The seminar was of value       4.50
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.65
Overall:       4.67
Verbatim Comments:
The structure of the programme is really good.  I will   remember it forever.
Use case studies; more workshop activity. (Multiple replies)
The video project was good…keep it.
Everything was good…keep it as is.  Difficult to say how to   improve. (multiple replies)
Make it over more days to spread it out.  3 full days is tough.   (Multiple replies)
Switch up the teams so we all get to work together.
Some concepts are vague since some of us have no experience with large firms.
More time on the development activity.
Great programme.

************************************************************

Rotterdam School of Management – October 2012

Rotterdam, Nederlands

One day skill seminar

Scale of   1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree
Attendees   = 24
Program was well organized and presented       4.64
Concepts presented were clear       4.55
Concepts presented are important       4.59
Presenter gave good examples       4.68
There was adequate opportunity for   participation       4.50
Presenter spoke clearly       4.95
Presenter showed enthusiasm       4.86
Presenter demonstrated expertise       4.77
Presenter engaged attendees       4.27
Presenter answered my questions       4.36
I understand the concepts presented       4.64
The seminar met my expectations       4.41
The seminar was of value       4.45
I would recommend this seminar for   future use       4.45
Overall:       4.58
Verbatim Comments:
Spend more time on   development planning (multiple)
Give more practical tips to   enhancing personal skills
Content was excellent. Bring   more examples and activities
Participate in activities and   show us good leadership examples
Programme was really   useful.  Thank you for a great seminar!
Split into 2 or more days to process   all the info and reflect on it
Class size could have been slightly   smaller

************************************************************

Prague University of Economics – May 2012

Prague, Czech Republic

One day skill seminar

(Scale of 1 to 5 with 5 = Strongly Agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented        4.94
Concepts presented were clear        4.88
Concepts presented are important        4.71
Presenter gave good examples        4.76
There was adequate opportunity for participation        4.76
Development planning workshop activity helpful        4.06
Presenter spoke clearly        4.88
Presenter showed enthusiasm        4.94
Presenter demonstrated expertise        4.88
Presenter engaged attendees to participate        4.88
Presenter answered my questions        4.71
I understand the concepts presented        4.76
I can apply the concepts presented        4.12
The seminar met my expectations        4.41
The seminar was of value        4.59
I would recommend this seminar for future use        4.76
Overall        4.69
Total attendees 17
Verbatim Comments:
Would like to see examples of leadership styles
Include more interaction
Amazing the way it is
Make the development part more interactive
First rate job
A few more activities and role plays
Make it 2 days – cover more topics – give it more time

************************************************************

Corvinus University Budapest – April 2012

Budapest, Hungary

One day skill seminar

(Scale   of 1 to 5 with 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)
The program was well organized and presented        4.60
Concepts presented were clear        5.00
Concepts presented are important        5.00
Presenter gave good examples        4.60
There was adequate opportunity for participation        4.00
Development planning workshop activity helpful        4.60
Presenter spoke clearly        4.80
Presenter showed enthusiasm        4.80
Presenter demonstrated expertise        5.00
Presenter engaged attendees to participate        4.60
Presenter answered my questions        4.40
I understand the concepts presented        4.80
I can apply the concepts presented        3.80
The seminar met my expectations        4.60
The seminar was of value        4.60
I would recommend this seminar for future use        4.80
Overall        4.63
Verbatim Comments:
Excellent program.  It was a pleasure to participate.
Add more activities that require participation.
Give the opportunity to try some of the skills or methods taught.
Make it longer. This would have been useful for all my colleagues.
Really useful and interesting.  I definitely suggest it for other people.
This program was of high value.

 

*************************************************

Wirtschaft University of Vienna – November 2011

Vienna, Austria

Full week block seminar

Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree; 1=Strongly Disagree
28 Attendees
The program was well organized and presented                                                4.93
Concepts presented were clear 4.82
Concepts presented are important 4.79
Presenter gave good examples 4.79
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.75
Development planning workshop activity helpful 4.39
Presenter spoke clearly 5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.96
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.93
Presenter actively engaged attendees 4.82
Presenter answered my questions 4.82
I understand the concepts presented 4.61
I can apply the concepts presented 4.36
The seminar met my expectations 4.54
The seminar was of value 4.75
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.64
Overall 4.74
Verbatim Comments
Schedule of days made it difficult to do case studies.
Make it 5 days instead of 3 so that we can learn more (multiple comments).
Make more people aware of this course and give more students the opportunity to take it
Integrate technology into the presentation materials.
Increased group activities…and have more cases.
A great course!
More time to work on development.
It’s pretty d— good!
Scott’s own leadership through the course was as much of an example as the lectures.
Really enjoyed the week.
Awesome course; leave it the way it is!
Everything was well prepared and okay.
Be stricter with time constraints on case presentations.
This was great, I loved it.
Spend one on one time with each participant to plan development.

 

******************************************************************************

Iacocca Institute

Bethlehem, Pa., USA

Breakfast Seminar for Professionals

Total Surveys returned 67/109 61%
Session WAS Informative 65 97.0
Session NOT Informative 1 1.5
No Answer 1 1.5
Speaker Presentation Style Rating
Poor 0 0.0
Below Average 1 1.5
Average 7 10.4
Above Average 33 49.3
Excellent 26 38.8
No Answer 0 0.0
Interested in a full day seminar?
Yes 52 77.6
No 10 14.9
General Comments
 The best, most specific and unique info of the last 3 sessions.
 Excellent presentation of relevant content. Thank you!
 The speaker was clearly knowledgable about the topic and gave good examples.
 Well spoken, knowledgeable and BELIEVABLE.
 Spoke clear, stuck to allowed time, was able to answer impromptu questions.
 Very constructive, informative. Best of last 3 sessions!
Very excellent information and delivery. Would have appreciated a) letting US/ challenging us to ID which level was the issue for each of his examples. THEN give us the answer in the slide
 I wasn’t expecting it to be customer-centric – very holistic approach
 Extremely boring slides, not dynamic, content was good
 Very quick – geared toward sales/ production
 Thought it would deal more with the skills needed to achieve commitment from employees not necessarily the customer

*****************************************************************************

Prague University of Economics – March, 2011

Prague, Czech Republic

Full-Day Seminar and Workshop

27 Attendees

(Scale of 1 – 5 where 5 = Strongly Agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)

Program was well organized and presented 4.70
Concepts presented were clear 4.87
Concepts presented are important 4.57
Presenter gave good examples 4.83
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.52
Development planning workshop activity helpful 3.78
Presenter spoke clearly 4.87
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.91
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.91
Presenter answered my questions 4.30
I understand the concepts presented 4.57
I can apply the concepts presented 4.35
The seminar met my expectations 4.35
The seminar was of value 4.65
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.78
Overall 4.60

Verbatim Comments:

  • Include Alumni
  • Make it two days. (Many responses)
  • Liked the practical application of the model and the seminar. (Multiple responses)
  • More opportunity to participate – case studies to apply concepts – more time. (Multiple responses)
  • More examples of leadership issues at more junior levels.
  • Thank you for a great seminar.  I learned a lot.  The handouts are great.  (Multiple responses)

******************************************************************************

Cornivus University of Economics, February, 2011

Budapest, Hungary

Full-Day Seminar and Workshop

19 attendees

(Scale of 1 – 5 where 5 = Strongly Agree and 1 = Strongly Disagree)

The program was well organized and presented 5.00
Concepts presented were clear 4.88
Concepts presented are important 4.76
Presenter gave good examples 4.82
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.76
Development planning workshop activity helpful 4.53
Presenter spoke clearly 4.71
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.94
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.82
Presenter answered my questions 4.88
I understand the concepts presented 4.76
I can apply the concepts presented 4.24
The seminar met my expectations 4.71
The seminar was of value 4.88
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.88
Overall 4.77

Verbatim Comments:

  • Make clearer how levels of commitment in the hierarchy build on each other.
  • Make the programme 2 days.

**************************************************

Wirtschaft University of Vienna, October, 2010

Vienna, Austria

Full Week Block Seminar

24 attendees

(Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree)

The program was well organized and presented 4.67
Concepts presented were clear 4.71
Concepts presented are important 4.71
Presenter gave good examples 4.75
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.58
History of Leadership models discussion was useful 3.96
Leadership Triad discussion was useful 4.25
Hierarchy of Commitment© model was useful 4.67
Case Study activity was useful 4.54
Development planning workshop activity helpful 4.04
Presenter spoke clearly 4.79
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.96
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.83
Presenter answered my questions 4.75
I understand the concepts presented 4.58
I can apply the concepts presented 4.38
The seminar met my expectations 4.63
The seminar was of value 4.75
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.83
Overall 4.60

Verbatim Comments:

  • More discussion of cultural differences in leadership.
  • I will strongly recommend this course to fellow students.
  • Assign different cases to each group so we see some other applications of leadership concepts.  Otherwise, great class.
  • Really good class.  Perhaps some case studies with European companies when teaching in Europe.
  • It was probably one of the most interesting classes that I have had as a student.
  • A lot of information…could use more discussion.
  • Great class.  It was interesting to have a class with practical application of concepts. (multiple responses)

*******************************************

University of Cologne, November, 2010

Cologne, Germany

Full Day Seminar and Workshop

14 attendees

(Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree)

The program was well organized and presented 4.50
Concepts presented were clear 4.93
Concepts presented are important 4.71
Presenter gave good examples 4.57
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.21
Development planning workshop activity helpful 3.50
Presenter spoke clearly 5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.93
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.93
Presenter answered my questions 4.57
I understand the concepts presented 4.93
I can apply the concepts presented 4.07
The seminar met my expectations 4.14
The seminar was of value 4.71
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.64
Overall 4.56

Verbatim Comments:

  1. More time on development planning.
  2. It was great…best skill seminar we have had…more examples and more activities…more time in general..perhaps role playing or case study.
  3. More advice for young specialists.
  4. Address culttural differences more.
  5. Incorporate a variety of teaching tools and media…video, pictures, film, etc.

*******************************************************************

Prague University of Economics – Full Day Seminar

Prague, Czech Republic

April 2010

18 attendees

(Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree)

Program was well organized and presented 4.39
Concepts presented were clear 4.61
Concepts presented are important 4.50
Presenter gave good examples 4.39
There was adequate opportunity for participation 3.83
Development planning workshop activity helpful 3.17
Presenter spoke clearly 4.83
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.78
Presenter demonstrated expertise 5.00
Presenter answered my questions 4.44
I understand the concepts presented 4.44
I can apply the concepts presented 3.78
The seminar met my expectations 4.17
The seminar was of value 4.28
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.50
Overall 4.34

Verbatim Comments:

  1. More Examples.
  2. More interactive time and work group activity.
  3. More case studies and participation
  4. Extremely interesting subject and concept.
  5. Overall very good seminar
  6. Speaker knows the subject well.
  7. Would like more time – perhaps make it 2 days.
  8. The best of the 5 seminars we have had.

**********************************************************************

Cornivus University of Economics – Full Day Seminar

Budapest, Hungary

April 2010

20 attendees

(Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree)

The program was well organized and presented 4.60
Concepts presented were clear 4.60
Concepts presented are important 4.60
Presenter gave good examples 4.50
There was adequate opportunity for participation 4.00
Development planning workshop activity helpful 3.40
Presenter spoke clearly 4.85
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.80
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.85
Presenter answered my questions 4.60
I understand the concepts presented 4.55
I can apply the concepts presented 4.05
The seminar met my expectations 4.10
The seminar was of value 4.35
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.35
Overall 4.41

Verbatim Comments:

  1. I highly recommend this seminar to all, it is very useful (multiple responses)
  2. Needed more time for group activity (multiple responses)
  3. Have more group activity (multiple responses)
  4. More time for interaction and debate.
  5. Add a section on “pre-leadership” roles.

*********************************************************************

Wirstschaft University of Vienna – Full Week Block Seminar

Vienna, Austria

November 2009

16 attendees

(Scale of 1-5 with 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree)

The program was well organized and presented 4.88
Concepts presentred were clear 4.88
Concepts presented are important 4.63
Presenter gave good examples 4.88
There was adequate opportunity for Participation 4.81
Development planning workshop activity helpful 4.56
Presenter spoke clearly 5.00
Presenter showed enthusiasm 4.94
Presenter demonstrated expertise 4.94
Presenter answered my questions 4.75
I understand the concepts presented 4.63
I can apply the concepts presented 4.44
The seminar met my expectations 4.88
The seminar was of value 4.94
I would recommend this seminar for future use 4.88
Overall 4.80

Verbatim Comments:

  1. Historical section useful for understanding how leadership has changed
  2. Essential for understanding leaders roles and goals (mutiple responses)
  3. Good ideas and insights (multiple repsonses)
  4. Would like more examples and more interaction (multiple responses)
  5. Learned a lot (multpile respponses)
  6. Did not like the Myers Briggs.  A bit skeptical of the model.
  7. Leadership Triad was a bit too conceptual.
  8. Hierarchy of Commitment © was very good (multiple responses)
  9. Seminar was very good; left people wanting for more.

*********************************************************************